Prior to these meetings, an online survey obtained input from almost 400 residents.
·
Well
maintained, safe and secure facilities are the most important needs (99%).
·
Almost
all residents want a wide variety of facilities available (91%) with play
facilities (85%).
·
Most
people want the park to offer opportunities for interaction with nature (82%)
and to look and feel open (79%) and welcoming (75%).
·
Slightly
fewer find it important to have peace and quiet (68%) and to have lots of
activity available (65%).
·
Improvements
that were most preferred included:
·
Repair
the pool building (the building is a synthetic stucco façade with a great deal
of water and structural wood damage)
·
Add
water play features such as spray play to the pool
·
Add
shade to the pool area
·
Upgrade
the restrooms
·
Add
path lighting
·
Upgrade / expand playgrounds
One of the big surprises
regarding the Shadowbend pool facilities, in comparison to the new Sawmill Pool
for example, was the very poor condition of the building and the need to bring
the pool and its equipment up to current Health and Building Codes. This work
is estimated to cost about $427,000 before we could even think about other improvements
to the pool or the park itself. Additional costs were estimated at $523,000 to
upgrade the pool amenities to be on par with what our newer parks have today
and another $435,000 for improvements to the park itself.
The Board considered all of these
factors and resident input in deciding on the scope of the project at its June
26th meeting. The Board, including myself, approved (with one
Director opposing) a preliminary budget of $1,385,500. The one opposing Director wanted to hold the
cost at $1 million but had no suggestions as to what reductions in scope should
be made to achieve this lower budget. I thought the lower budget was unreasonable
given we will need to spend almost half of this $1 million to bring the pool up
to code before any improvements could even be made. I do believe we need to
watch any “scope creep” and hold the budget to what we have approved.
During the meeting, a lot of the
discussion revolved around this very large budget amount in comparison to an
initial budget of $500,000. When Sawmill
Park was recently redone, the cost of that pool was about $980,000. It also had
a placeholder budget of $500,000. If one
subtracts the significant Shadowbend pool building and equipment repair costs
of $427,000 from its budget, the two projects appear to be very comparable,
around $1 million. The Board will have an opportunity to revisit this matter as
the project goes through the design and bid process. The future checkpoints
are:
·
November
2013- Board reviews/approves Shadowbend Park Renovation Bids
·
January
2014- Renovation Starts
·
May 10, 2014 (or earlier)- Renovation
Complete
The longer term issue is that
using a $500,000 budget placeholder for these sorts of improvements is not
realistic and we need to get “real.” We need to reconsider what we need to set
aside over the next 20 years to refurbish our major parks and the other 12 pools
when their time comes. This will be a major consideration during our July
budget meetings—what is needed in our capital project sinking fund to pay for
the $170 million in assets and amenities we will need to replace or refurbish
over the next 20 years?
No comments:
Post a Comment