Now
that I have passed my “first year anniversary” I felt it was time to step back
to reflect on what has been accomplished. My governance experience over the
last 13 years has taught me that there is no room in government for egos or the
“I” word. Governing requires leadership, seeking to understand the viewpoints
of others, consensus building and sometimes compromise. But one must also
recognize that compromise does not mean one has to sacrifice one’s principles
and values. Our Board members do not always agree on everything. But most often
we are able to talk through the issues and reach a compromise that is best for
all.
I believe
The Township Board and Staff have worked well together to accomplish a lot in
the last 1 ½ years. For example our team effort has resulted in the following:
•We
have continued to preserve all the attributes of our master planned community
which we inherited. This responsibility requires an unwavering commitment to:
--Public
safety
--Enforcement
of our Covenants and Standards which have served our community well for many
years and are critical to protecting property values
--Maintenance
and enhancement of all of our family oriented amenities- parks, pools, pathways
and sports fields
--Sponsorship
of community events to support our Village Associations and to reinforce a
sense of community
These
are critical attributes of our master planned community, attributes that
attract people to live, work and play in the Woodlands. In turn, these same
strengths have attracted many companies to locate in The Woodlands. We are no
longer solely a “bedroom community” for Houston.
•In
2012 and 2013, we spent a significant amount of time to evaluate the impact
incorporation might have on our community, governance structure and costs. This
included a very aggressive outreach effort to our community. The end result was
that our community saw no overriding reason or urgency to incorporate anytime
soon. We have until 2057 to make such a decision and there was no compelling
reason to take such a step now or in the foreseeable future. In fact, if the
power of Home Rule cities to arbitrary annex adjoining communities was
eliminated, there may never be a need for the Township to incorporate. I
believe the Township governance model provides a very effective alternative to
the traditional municipal form of government.
•We
have kept down the growth in our operating expenses, continuing to focus on
what we think are our core functions.
The Township continually looks for ways to reduce our costs. A recent
example is our insurance program. We spent a good part of 2013 reevaluating the
coverage needed to reduce our risk of a major loss. This work cumulated in the
recent selection of the Texas Municipal League (TML) as our new insurance
carrier. TML provided much broader coverage with over a $1 million savings-
more coverage at less cost. Not a bad deal!
•As
a result of keeping our cost down and our economic growth, we have reduced
property taxes by 10.4% over the last four years. For the first time, our
property tax revenue in 2014 will be less than 50% of our total revenue. We
expect Sales and Hotel Taxes to constitute about 52% of our total revenue. This
is exactly the opposite of what most cities are experiencing today. A 2012 TML
survey shows that municipal government revenue across Texas was derived 58%
from property tax and 42% from sales tax revenue.
•We
have made effective use of debt, using debt only where it was required and made
financial sense. When the Township was formed, it had no surpluses or
reserves. In fact, it had to assume debt
incurred by the TCID and the HOAs. In addition, the Township had to take on $17
million of debt to pay Houston and Conroe not to annex us before 2057. In 2014,
the Township will pay off the remaining $14 million of this debt. The Township
does not over rely on debt. In addition, it has accumulated a 20% “rainy day”
contingency fund. In so doing we have achieved an AAA credit rating.
•The
Township is one of the few government entities that values and executes long
range planning. We have a Five Year Plan which is continually updated and
revised based on our best knowledge at the time. This planning allows us to
make effective operating and financing decisions. It gives us the confidence
that when we decide to lower taxes, the reduction will stick.
•In
2013, we finalized a plan to provide annual funding for a new Capital
Replacement Fund. This fund is intended to provide for the replacement of
existing Township capital assets when they reach the end of their useful lives.
Over the next 20 years, The Township will need to replace or refurbish the $230
of community amenities and other assets we have today. This funding approach
will allow us to “pay as we go” and avoid future debt to fund the replacement
and major refurbishment of our many amenities and other assets.
•Although
the Township has no statutory responsibility over its roads, we recognized in
2012 the negative impact growth was going to have on our mobility and
congestion. We have become much more proactive in collaborating with the County
and the Woodlands Road Utility District to address these issues. Our efforts
started with the recognition that the County and The Township must be much more
proactive at the regional level in securing our share of matching federal and
state transportation funds. This recognition has led to the current mobility
studies for South County. No one will receive matching funds if they do not
have a plan in place and that plan is integrated into the regional
transportation plans.
In
addition, we are now responsible for transit in our area. In undertaking our new role, we have dealt
with the growing service and funding issues we inherited with the Woodlands
Express, a service we became responsible for in October 2013. Through our
recent initiatives, we have reversed the declining financial performance of the
Express to insure that it will not require local taxpayer dollars in the
future. The Express is a critical service for many of our South County
residents but it must pay for itself.
•Lastly,
The Township was accused in the recent 2013 election of “undisciplined spending
and the automatic renewal of contracts.”
I can say that all of us on the Board would strongly disagree with such
assertions. To deal with this unwarranted assertion, the Board recently asked
our staff to review all of our procurement decisions over the last year. I
believe this analysis supports the view that 1) the Township has a very
competitive, fair procurement process in place and 2) The Board selects the
best and highest quality solution at the most reasonable cost. For the most
part these decisions translate into the lowest cost supplier. But in a few
cases quality is more important than cost and the Board have selected someone
that has higher cost but the difference has been very minor.
The
Township Board should be proud of what it has accomplished. I hope all of you voters agree,
which is really what counts.
No comments:
Post a Comment